Thursday, February 27, 2020

Case Analysis of Denver International Airport Essay

Case Analysis of Denver International Airport - Essay Example When it finally opened to the public 16 months behind schedule it has 5 runways and 88 gates and in many ways represented a model airport for the future. According to the master plan the airlines tenants were expected to install their own baggage handling system, thus excluding the construction of a baggage handling system by the overall DIA project. Subsequently, United Airlines insisted on an automated high-speed baggage system. The Denver officials designed a large scale baggage handling system at a cost of $193 million that would require no manual labor (Ma ¨hring, Holmstro ¨m, Keil & Montealegre (2004). The design was intended to run faster and more reliable than traditional technology. The root cause of the problem is that the city failed to properly plan for the construction of the new DIA airport. They moved ahead with the designing and construction of the airport with out the input of the customers. The root cause of the problem was the faulty planning. The first and foremost reason was that the baggage handling system was not decided at the initial stage. It was a subsequent addition by which time the basic design had already been approved. In addition to the late decision of building the automated baggage handling system, during the development stage, the airlines kept changing their requirements. This led to frequent changes in the design and construction. The power systems for the revised design were not altered, which led to overloaded motors and finally mechanical failures in the system testing. The optical sensors also did not read the barcode properly which caused the system routing problem. BAE had been appointed to design and implement the automated baggage handling system. At the same time, BAE, United airlines and the City of Denver, all has their own consultants and project leaders. BAE enjoyed the reputation of being among the best and on the strength of its good

Monday, February 10, 2020

Macroeconomics...........case5 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Macroeconomics...........case5 - Case Study Example Economist Paul Collier, of Oxford Univesity in England, has examined what went wrong with these â€Å"trapped countries.† Based on decades of research, he identifies some poverty traps. About 750 million people of the bottom billion have recently lived through, or are still in the midst of, a civil war. Such wars can drag on for years with economically disastrous consequences. For example, the ethnic conflict in Burundi between the Hutus and the Tutsis has lasted three decades, which helps explain that country’s poorest-in-the-world ranking. Unfortunately, the poorer a country becomes, the more likely it is to succumb to civil war. And once a country goes through one civil war, more are likely. Ethnic conflict, or civil war, is Collier’s first poverty trap. But why, aside from poverty itself, are so many sub-Saharan countries mired in civil war? He finds that three factors heighten the risk of such conflicts: (1) a relatively high proportion of young, uneducated men with few job prospects (who, thus, have a low opportunity cost); (2) an imbalance between ethnic groups, with one tending to outnumber the rest; and (3) a supply of natural resources like diamonds or oil, which both creates an incentive to rebel and helps finance that rebellion. The presence of mineral wealth in an otherwise poor country can also undermine democracy itself. Government revenue from mineral sales reduces taxes, which dampens public debate about how taxes should be spent. For example, because of oil revenue, the Nigerian government relies less on taxes, so there is less pressure for government accountability, and hence fewer checks and balances on a corrupt government. Thus, misuse of resource wealth is Collier’s second poverty trap. About 300 million o f the poorest billion live in countries that have fallen into this trap. This leads us to the third poverty trap: a dysfunctional or corrupt government. Government